Thursday, 29 September 2011

The Sorrows of the City of Joy - Leena Kejriwal [review]

Leena Kejriwal’s installation of photographs, Entropic Sites, curated by Shaheen Merali at Shrine Empire Gallery, New Delhi, from the 21st of January to the 21st February, 2011, presented an intriguing study of the city of Kolkata. Superimposed photographs were hung from the floor to the ceiling. Speaking voices from a documentary on human trafficking jarred with their American accents. Hung light bulbs in the centre of the room evoked an atmosphere rather than illuminate the works on the walls packed with images of Subhash Chandra Bose.

The coloured photographs were re-worked to create caricatures or ghostly ‘absent presences’ of people. An empty cubbyhole added to this, while the disembodied voices created a sense of displacement. Babu on the Terrace augmented this sense of dislocation, where a Babu was seen on a Victorian terrace overlooking a crowded, middle-class residential complex. Dressed in dhoti and kurta, wearing a supercilious expression, he seemed to look into the horizon. The sky above was covered with menacing predatory birds. Kejriwal probably intended to depict the arrogant Babu preying upon a disputable inheritance and through the solarized images she probably intended to comment on the carelessness of the upper class Bengali gentry.

However, the inclusion of a documentary on prostitution in the show confused both the intent and content. Its pertinence was lost thanks to the overloaded commentary. If Kejriwal intended to evoke guilt, she failed, revealing instead, that such complex situations require greater objectivity and sensitivity in selection and presentation.

Thursday, 25 August 2011

Manjit Bawa - Readings, edited by Ina Puri [Book Review]


Book Title:      ‘Readings’ Manjit Bawa                  
Edited and
compiled by:       Ina Puri
Published by:      Lalit Kala Akademi,
                               New Delhi ,2010
Paperback 
220pages 
Size                           18 x23.75 cms
Full Colour
ISBN: 81-87507-42-X 
Price:                    Rupees 1,000/-

 

Manjit Bawa was an individualist; an artist and human being who lived life on his own terms. Through his art, he brought into play modern modes of expression in painting, while also referencing the Indian aesthetic. “Being a turbaned Sikh from an ordinary middle-class family was daunting enough but to strike out against the prevalent forces of Cubism and the iconic Klee was to really ask for big trouble”[i].But he did venture out; creating a new figure, a new landscape and spoke in a new voice.
Art in its essence is an experience; a silent communion between a viewer and an artist’s canvas. Its understanding matures as we do. The simplicity of this communion has become compounded in the crowding of urban life, where time is at a premium and such contemplation a luxury. Today, for most people, art is either a commodity to invest in or too challenging an intellectual activity to participate in. For some, art has been reduced to being just a piece of decoration.

Each artist however, spends a life-time devising an iconography that speaks most evocatively of their thoughts and feelings. This complex language that encompasses all dimensions of their being is not easy to decipher. In Manjit Bawa’s own words[ii] his work was “a continuous process that takes up almost all my waking hours. Even when I sleep, I have experienced visions in my dreams that are related to my painting activities….. I wanted to create my own style….to find a new idiom and a new language. In every sense, this was a stumbling block that needed to be tackled with immense patience and fortitude[iii]”.
Many books about artists become technical and theoretically complex, excluding rather than including the lay viewer. ‘Readings, Manjit Bawa’ compiled and edited by Ina Puri, published by Lalit Kala Akademi, New Delhi, reaches out to us through essays, interviews, conversations and reminisces by Manjit Bawa himself and other artists, providing a unique insight into the artist and his oeuvre. It is not didactic, but eclectic; each reader is thus able to formulate their own ideas, to look at the artist’s canvas through these perceptions. The text is bi-lingual. There are writings in both Hindi and English. Ina Puri’s close association with Bawa’s art reveals itself through this selection, providing insight into the man, his persona and what made his art; the people that influenced him and how childhood memories led to the cow and goat becoming leitmotifs.  Prayag Shukla [in Hindi], sums up that the animals and birds and all the different emotions and feelings that Bawa brought to life on his canvasses that had not been seen before in Indian Art and “in par ab Manjit ki ek vishisht chaap hai” that the seasons and their colours have“apne he vishisht aakaron aur rangon mein kramash dhaal liya.”

Informative and refreshing to read, the book is illustrated with over forty full colour plates, photographs of the artist and some of his drawings. A full list of collectors is appended at the back of the book, but regrettably none of the works are dated. It would also have been useful to include a small biographical note on each of the authors published in this compilation. A comprehensive biography of Bawa tells us about his numerous exhibitions and art camps he attended. We also learn that Bawa curated shows of Indian Art in Syria, Egypt and Australia, was a founder member on the Committee for Communal Harmony, organized peace marches during the anti-Sikh riots and more.
Essays by Ranjit Hoskote, Ashok Vajpeyi, Gayatri Sinha, Richard Bartholomew, Ina Puri, Geeti Sen, S. Kalidas and Madan Gopal Singh bring some in-depth analysis and critical insights, while painter Krishen Khanna, a friend through the decades, reminisces of his early encounters with Bawa. J Swaminathan, friend and fellow painter, does a quick summary of the evolution of the modern Indian art movement from Amrita Sher-Gil to Tyeb Mehta, stating that “Manjit’s figure is at once an assertion of a tradition and its negation” owing hardly anything to the realism of the West, suggesting instead a linkage with the Pahari Miniature tradition.
 A year before the riots in Ayodhya, Bawa wrote an article for the Times of India which provides a glimpse of the artist’s unusual perception of things. He also brought attention to the fact that most people agitating in the name of Ram were quite ignorant about the Ramayana. They were mostly “sons of shopkeepers and petty merchants…. seething with frustration”. He arrived at this conclusion, not through some obscure intellectual analysis, but by engaging with people on the ground: one human being to another.          

The book has diverse material on Bawa’s evolution as an artist, his engagement with the world, involvement with communal issues, work as a curator and artist and also how he encouraged younger, aspiring artists.  His preoccupation with various dimensions of being, both physical and spiritual, all find place in these readings. In a talk given to art students at Shantiniketan he ends, with accrediting Ina Puri for motivating him to think anew and sums up with a Sufi saying: “simply trust…… do not the petals flutter just like that? Trust life….” He was well versed in the Hindu epics and could challenge the young protestors outside the Babri Masjid on the Ramayan just as easily as he could quote from the Gita, even though he “found it difficult to subscribe to many of these values.” An independent thinker, he questioned things. This is brought to life in this book, as in his art.
The interpretations of Manjit Bawa’s art are many and all equally illuminating.  Hoskote finds a “jagged edge of eroticism and risk in an intimate battle of beak and dagger, the swelling tongue of the bull, the tumescence of the goat” adding that “Bawa is more significantly preoccupied with the sheerness of pleasure at the edge of language.” While Kamala Kapoor sites that “Bawa’s images…. appear to reflect his desire to intervene in a world burdened with over-rationality, as he draws forms in the air that undulate and reform into pliable boneless shapes.”In a small note of personal appreciation, the author David Davidar makes an interesting observation about Bawa’s use of colour, where “artwork so vibrantly alive in hues of yellow, red, carmine, electric blue, green and gold was tamed, cooled and recombined through some strange alchemy such that a flaming red soothed the eyes, a glaring yellow could alleviate a migraine headache and the startling blues suggested a cool draught of water.”
The book may not represent an exhaustive research and analysis of the artist’s work, but it is the kind of book that makes Manjit Bawa and his art accessible to a large section of people. We become acquainted with the man behind the images on his canvas, from whom readers will draw hope, solace and inspiration at many levels.  The mix of analytical essays with reminisces, interviews, exhibition reviews and writings by the artist himself, give this book a unique place:  useful to the student of art, to artists, to the lay public and also the scholar. It is the first book in the series called ‘Readings’ of writings on artists and sculptors introduced by Lalit Kala Akademi, New Delhi.


[i] Manjit Bawa Pg 65
[ii] Shantiniketan 1998
[iii] Manjit Bawa Pg 95

Saturday, 28 May 2011

WhatAsana Was It All About? [Jenny Bhatt review, Gallery Seven Art]


‘MokshaShots’ by Jenny Bhatt at Gallery Seven Art, New Delhi, 10th March to 3rd April 2011, was a colourful presentation bordering on the psychedelic. The idea that spiritual liberation may take many life-times, but you could get a taste of the sublime through Bhatt’s tongue-in-cheek exploration had the promise of a fun-filled experience. However, the interplay between liberation through consumerism and the spiritual aspects of moksha was confused. Bhatt’s attempt to paint a satirical view of urban Indian consumer culture, focusing on how art, spirituality, media and emotion have been packaged as commodities was also not really witty nor was her critique objective. The concept itself lacked clarity and depth of exploration.
 

 Bhatt employed an inventive visual vocabulary, creating deities called ‘MokshaPets’ such as ‘MokshaBuy’ ‘Mokshasura,’ ‘MokshaBum’ ‘Kundalini’, ‘Reverence’ and ‘Irreverence’, Third eye, Eye Ball and ThoughtPill. They clearly inhabited a world of their own and the viewing experience would have been more inclusive had the gallery space been used to present dimensions of this unique, not-seen-before world. The spartan presentation of a few painted canvassed on white walls with vinyl stickers sprinkled across the floor and ceiling did not quite evoke the necessary atmosphere to enable  viewers to participate in and engage more actively with characters that most people in Delhi encountered for the first time.
 
 The artist’s involvement with her unique characters was visible. Her sense of humour too was evident through titles devised for the different postures in which each character was depicted. ‘Gulpasana’ was a portrait of ‘MokshaBuy’, gulping it all down. There was ‘Oopsasana’, ‘Champagnepopasana’, ‘Thoughtpillasana’ and other such works that allowed the viewer a glimpse of Bhatt’s enjoyment in the process of creating them. You wanted to share in the laughter but were never quite sure whether you should, for it often seemed that Bhatt was laughing at you and the stories about the icons seemed more alive in her own mind than on the canvasses hung on the gallery walls.

In the ‘MokshaBuy Mandla’ painted with acrylic on canvas [191.92x191.92cms], a many-armed creature modelled perhaps on goddess Durga of the Hindu pantheon was seen with shopping bags, credit cards, currency notes, an extraordinarily long shopping-list, ice-cream, a blood-stained sickle and more. This creature with eight arms stood atop the philosopher ‘MokshaBum’, surrounded by other characters invented by Bhatt. She conjured up imagery depicting the life of this goddess of retail therapy who had drawn blood too. Cloud and fire forms found in traditional Tibetan Thangka paintings were also incorporated in the picture. The ugly, purple deity with three eyes, evil red lips and a tongue that extended below her feet, also held a ‘jap mala’. On the one hand the artist purports to critique consumerism and its excesses, yet she calls it ‘MokshaShots’ or “taste of the sublime”. At the same time she also uses items such as the ‘mala’ associated with spiritual seekers which have ascetic connotations, confusing the issue. If consumerism is her path, of what significance is the ‘jap mala’? Is it about the insincerity of the seeker? Is it about the general confusion around the idea of moksha? Or is it about experiencing the sublime through consumerism?

In the ‘MokshaBum’ Mandala [2009, 121.92x121.92 cms] a cute, all blue creature with arms folded in a lazy, thinking posture, with a pink halo which could have been the cushion he was seated on, looked starry-eyed into space. His eyes didn’t confront you; he was clearly in his own world. Through this, the artist intended to exemplify the thinker and armchair philosopher, who never got up and moved, achieved little but expounded a lot; but the visual did not convey this. Bhatt used the concept of over-indulgence to denote fulfilment where ‘MokshaBuy’ supposedly attained moksha through excessive buying. She then presented ‘MokshaBum’ as the philosopher and an escapist, doing nothing but thinking, turning the idea of indulgences around, to represent now, the futility of a single dimensional approach, thus contradicting herself. 

Bhatt had imagined an elaborate life for these characters. The artist statement suggested that ‘MokshaBum’ may even have a girlfriend, lending credence to the idea that the visual alone was inadequate to present the fullest extent of her ideas and philosophy. Much greater intellectual investment and involvement as well as creative thinking was needed to bring alive this world successfully. An animation film or video could have been a possibility. In fact her digital interactive video created a much more authentic world, where you could participate. As an application on social networking sites such as Facebook, it may succeed in providing the kind of experience Bhatt possibly envisaged. Her concept is individualistic and the characters quite original but they lacked depth of exploration and thus appeared too cartoon-like and superficial. In addition, Bhatt appears to take the spiritual idea of moksha or liberation on the one hand quite literally and then interprets it via consumerism using a rather ‘liberal’ interpretation, complicating the issue.  She is therefore unable to able to exemplify her point of view. 

 

 

Poised for Change.......? [Subodh Gupta review, Nature Morte]

The curious amorphous form printed on the card for Subodh Gupta’s 4th solo show ‘Oil on canvas’ at Gallery Nature Morte, New Delhi from 9th December 2010 to 23rd January 2011, was intriguing. The exhibition presented a wide-range of ideas all executed in 2010, from fibre glass serpents, marble edifices of the ubiquitous tiffin-carrier; cast bronze canvasses, steel eggs and more, but no paintings. The obvious implication that art making is no longer about oil on canvas was non-revelatory.  We readily see around us a gamut of media which includes video, performance, installation, photography and more, all of which have also been part of Subodh Gupta’s art practice. So what was the artist trying to say?  
Tiffin


Two tiffin-carriers [47.5" high x 16" in diameter] carved in white marble stood tall on a cement pedestal. Titled ‘Twins’, these simple, white sculptures soulfully captured insignificant details of the humble, boxed utensil; main-stay of middle class India even today. We had to circumambulate this [65" high x 59.5" wide x 25” deep] artefact in order to view it, which heightened the reverential quality accorded by the larger than life scale and purity of white marble.  It felt as though one was walking around the sarcophagi of entombed tiffin boxes. ‘Twins’ was the most powerful work on view. Did this allude to an end of the ‘bartan bhandar’ that has become a distinctive part of Gupta’s creative expression? 


Out of Nothing

The possibility of this was contradicted by “Out of Nothing” – a  70" high x 144" wide x 240" deep installation that comprised a 21 headed serpent, cast in black fibre glass lording over a mound of shiny steel utensils which simultaneously entrapped a part of its body beneath its gleaming mass. Black contrasted against silvery steel was visually powerful. The serpent heads looked at us, above the mound of kitchen clutter, not threateningly, but a trifle strained.  This contemporary version of the ancient, serpent-like chthonic water beast that possessed multiple heads, who for each head that was cut off, it grew two more, seemed to say, by virtue of it's mythical implications, that these cooking utensils were now an indispensable aspect of Gupta's art.




Right: Sunset. Centre: Atta.  against the wall centre to right: Oil
on Canvas
The commentary became even more confused with the variations of cast bronze slabs titled ‘Oil on Canvas’. Slabs of cast bronze [25.5" high x 25.5" wide x 1"], painted to look like blank canvasses were hung on the walls or placed randomly on the floor, leaning against the walls, their back to the viewer. In the centre of the room containing these ‘canvasses’ was ‘ Atta’ the amorphous form on the card - cast  bronze placed on a wooden table, sprinkled with wheat powder, measuring 39" high x 47" wide x 25.5" deep. On one side stood ‘Sunset’ an elaborately carved white marble almirah, with a video projection on the back wall. The delicately carved lattice reminded one of Mughal aesthetics and craftsmanship and was singularly different from the other works on display. Some other exhibits included “Inside”, a white marble thali, and sixteen found and used shoes placed on the thali, mounted on a white marble pedestal and “Three Rounds” made up of three brass urns. 

Bird
In another room a Subodh Gupta signature stainless steel sculpture, 63" high x 81" wide x 119" deep, resembled a larger than life egg-tray with 3 equally large eggs positioned within it. At first it was difficult to determine what this was. Parts of the tray were big enough to be the replica of a Jacuzzi tub, but as you went farther away, the form became apparent. It was curiously named ‘Bird’ leading one to consider what kind of bird would hatch from eggs made up of steel tumblers, boxes, milk containers and other such utensils. The protruding eggs were skillfully crafted. Their smooth egg-shape was especially commendable. This had been achieved despite the ridges between the odd shaped and sized objects welded together. 

Gupta’s art over the years has transformed objects of everyday Indian life into artworks of global recognition. They became part of a commentary that voiced concerns of a country whose rapid economic growth fuelled an equally advancing materialistic mindset, impacting our visual and social culture. The contemporary climatic, social and moral turmoil, unraveled daily through news reports, are an indication that values espoused today need to veer away from materiality and scale as being the indicators of success. Having indulged both materiality and scale, along with his stature as one of India’s most celebrated artists, Subodh Gupta is well placed to introduce an altered ideal. The question is whether he can. The presented exhibition seemed indicative of some kind of transition but one that lacked direction. Its commentary, if any was confused at best.




Monday, 28 March 2011

An Inscrutable Legacy - Tyeb Mehta [Review] Vadehra Art Gallery

On a cold January evening, at the Vadehra Art Gallery in Defence Colony I was engulfed by large canvasses in warm hues of orange, reds and brown contrasted with white or off-white. In ‘Triumph of Vision’, an exhibition of works by Tyeb Mehta curated by Yashodhara Dalmia, his famous Mahishasura’s were well represented and of particular interest were the early drawings. In’ Trussed Bull on Richshaw’, 1994 [152.5 x 122 cms] Mehta’s almost ascetic approach to painting was striking with its almost imperceptible modelling of colour and stylistic rendition of the bull. The rest of the canvas was painted flat in colours of maroon and bottle green as deep umber surrounded an almost stark white bull, lying on the rickshaw, as if tied. There was nothing that seemed to tie him down except for the sheer agony that pervaded the entire contorted form. Intrigued by imagery that was so restrained in expression despite portraying a heartfelt angst, presented through the plight of a mute animal, I studied this canvas for a long time. The poster-like design and stark composition was inscrutable and the equally inscrutable catalogue essay did not reveal much either.


A retrospective exhibition presenting the work of one of India’s foremost painters, with a social, political and emotional perspective, far removed from the present, should have been presented as more than just an ordinary exhibition. The drawings did provide some context, but his early works, though printed in the catalogue were not on display. Besides this, there has to be much more archival material available that could communicate the significance of Mehta’s work, beyond its mere visual appeal.

On an adjacent wall, was a ‘Mahishasura’ painted in 2001 using acrylic on canvas[183 x 153 cms] in vibrant tones or carmine and vermillion with shades of beige, black and a rusted maroon.   Continuing my silent dialogue with the canvasses, I wondered how the artist had painted with such minimal fuss. Admiring the sparing marks I looked for references for evolution of his rather distinctive iconography. The catalogue text informed that Mehta renounced the family business to join Sir JJ School of Art, in Mumbai in 1947. This was also the year of India’s independence: a freedom hard won that paradoxically lamented the severing of the nation into two parts, where brothers once, now killed each other, believing they had a different God. I shuddered to think that not much had changed. It is January 2011 and similar battles ensue. Although these paintings are relatively recent; the drawings ‘Trussed Bull’ [1955] and ‘Bull’ [1955] indicate that the trussed-up bull as a metaphor evolved somewhere in the 1950’s. The forms then, were not angular but the economy of line that would become synonymous with Mehta is evident.

Contemporary Indian art is lush with opinion and expression. Artists have turned social commentators and performers. The diversity of ideas around us is chaotic, making the minimal marks of Tyeb Mehta appealing yet confounding. This is after all a part of our cultural and visual inheritance, so how did such ascetic expression, one that evolved at a hugely traumatic time for the nation, give way to such cacophonic confusion in the present time? There was clearly something to be learned as also something almost unreal about the work. Was it cold indifference and not emotional restraint? But the angst was also evident. I looked deeper. Was there more? ‘The Fall’ painted in 1974 [150 x 125 cms] seemed to be a turning point in Mehta’s oeuvre and thereafter the marks and expression were fine-tuned with an almost obsessive deliberation and unwavering discipline. On the surface it appeared that the artist had not explored anything beyond this phase. One wondered why.

Many have grown up in a time that did not see the traumas of partition and the agony of this has also been little spoken of by those who lived through that age. As a nation the collective pain was such that everyone seemed to have just put their energies into getting on with the business of building a nation, without looking back. Did they do us an injustice in not sharing in a personal capacity, what they saw and experienced? Were they right to shut out their pain? Could they have done it differently? Questions such as these that emerged as one looked at Tyeb Mehta’s works. I could not relate to them emotionally but when seen through the eyes of his time; through ‘Kali-I’, 1988 [150 x 125 cms] painted in a posture that seemed pregnant with abuse, realization dawned of what may have compelled him turn ascetic. Is it then, almost as a reaction to this that we are perhaps so verbose today?

The painter is significant for more than the paintings he did. This exhibition raised many questions and presentation of this body of work should have taken into consideration the value of Tyeb Mehta, not just in his capacity as a painter, but as an integral part of every contemporary Indian’s artistic inheritance. For appreciation by generations that come after the iconic times he and his contemporaries painted and lived in, this body of work needed to be presented in a manner that was accessible, de-mystifying the marks for cognition of their relevance in the larger context of Indian art as well as his own individual oeuvre.